Summary

This foundational paper introduces the concept of a Hedging Valuation Adjustment (HVA) — a valuation adjustment that captures the expected cost of transaction friction (bid-ask spreads) incurred by a delta-hedging strategy. The key insight is that friction costs can be treated as an adjustment to the frictionless price, analogous to how CVA, FVA and other XVAs adjust the risk-free value. The HVA is driven by the book’s gamma squared: , where is the portfolio gamma, the delta threshold for rehedging, the volatility, and the friction cost function.

The paper develops two variants: a hedged HVA (where the HVA itself is included in the value being hedged, evaluated under the risk-neutral measure ) and an unhedged HVA (treated as a reserve, evaluated under the real-world measure ). The hedged case introduces a remarkable feature: the total value satisfies a Black-Scholes-type PDE but with an imaginary effective volatility , which can become negative for options with large positive gamma and high friction costs. This imaginary vol implies the option value can become negative — a dramatic admission that the no-arbitrage hedging argument breaks down when friction overwhelms the hedging benefit.

The formalism extends naturally to multi-asset portfolios via a trace formulation , where is a relative cost matrix and the covariance matrix. The extension to new trade pricing yields a “new trade HVA” that is approximately twice the naive single-trade estimate, due to the quadratic dependence on book gamma.

Key Contributions

  • Introduction of the Hedging Valuation Adjustment (HVA) as a new XVA-type quantity measuring expected friction costs
  • Derivation of closed-form Feynman-Kac representations for both hedged (-measure) and unhedged (-measure) HVA
  • Discovery of “imaginary volatility” — the effective volatility becomes imaginary when friction costs are sufficiently large, implying option values can become negative
  • Extension to multi-asset books via the trace formulation with relative cost matrix
  • Discrete-time correction using Siegmund’s overshoot: with
  • New trade HVA allocation showing the marginal impact is approximately the naive estimate due to quadratic gamma dependence

Methodology

The derivation starts from a standard hedging portfolio with a delta-threshold rehedging strategy: buy/sell units of underlying whenever the net delta exceeds . The expected P&L is set to zero over each rehedging interval , yielding a modified Black-Scholes PDE with a source term . The friction rate arises from the expected rehedging frequency and expected cost per event. Splitting (risk-free value plus HVA) and applying the nonlinear Feynman-Kac formula yields the HVA as a discounted expectation of the friction rate. The unhedged case differs in hedging only (not ), leading to a convection-diffusion PDE under rather than .

Key Findings

  • The HVA has the form of a discounted integral of friction rate, proportional to
  • For the hedged case, the HVA is evaluated under ; for the unhedged case, under
  • Imaginary volatility arises when , implying positive theta and potentially negative option values
  • Discrete-time monitoring introduces a correction via the Siegmund overshoot factor, which is numerically very accurate
  • Numerical tests on 20Y ATM options show the HVA with discrete adjustment keeps average P&L flat at zero across varying thresholds, rates, and drifts
  • The multi-asset HVA mixes risks through the covariance matrix, projecting portfolio-level cross-gammas onto individual asset hedging costs

Important References

  1. Leland 1985 - Option pricing with transactions costs — seminal paper on option pricing with transaction costs that introduced the modified volatility approach
  2. Burgard and Kjaer 2013 - Funding Strategies Funding Costs — framework for FVA that the HVA formalism is designed to be consistent with
  3. Deep xVA Solver - A Neural Network Based Counterparty Credit Risk Management Framework — deep BSDE approach noted as potentially applicable to the nonlinear HVA PDE

Atomic Notes


paper